The Daoist Diaries

September 27, 2006

The Story on Cell Phone Safety

I see people using them just about everywhere I go these days; they are talking on them while driving, eating at restaurants, going for walks and even in the hallways of the local high schools. It is readily apparent that cell phone use is at an all-time high and showing no signs of slowing. But what is the cost of putting these little communication devices to our ears?? We all know they are dangerous to use while driving. But did we all know that they might be dangerous to talk on in general?   

I recently read some disturbing information about the supposed dangers of using cell phones. I was alarmed at what I read because I have and use a cell phone several days a week. But, in all honesty, I was not convinced by what I read because it appears that the author was also trying to sell products that are intended to protect us from the potential harm.  Thus, my quest for the real story behind the potential dangers of cell phones. I did my best to obtain information from the most reputable websites and here is what I discovered.

The claims behind the companies that are attempting to sell safety products are focused the electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted from cell phones and their effects on the brain, especially in children. This form of radiation has been referred to as electro pollution and is also emitted from cordless phones, computers and essentially any electrical appliance. Because children are starting to use cell phones at very young ages…as young as six years old…they will be the first generation to be exposed to EMFs for nearly their entire lives. And children and teenagers may be the most affected by the radiation because their skulls are thin, allowing the radiation to penetrate deeply into their brains.  The following quote is an excerpt from SafeWireless.org: 

“Since 1993, scientific studies have continued to accumulate showing that radiation from mobile telephones and other wireless devices is dangerous.  The mobile phone industry continues to deny the existence of a problem, and governments around the world continue to sort out both legal and ethical entanglements with the industry that render them impotent in terms of protecting consumers.  Now, new science clearly shows that a radio frequency radiation related disease epidemic has begun – the brunt of which will be borne by our children and grandchildren.  The Safe Wireless Initiative is here to empower consumers to protect themselves and their families.  Please help us by joining and supporting this most important of causes.  We ask for a modest membership fee that allows us to pay for the overhead associated with keeping this program current and useful.”Dr. George L. Carlo, Chairman, Science and Public Policy Institute Let us now flip the coin. I found several reputable websites dedicated to studying cell phone radiation and the effects on the brain. The FDA has a section of their Website dedicated to cell phone facts and a very easy to read page of questions and answers. The FDA Website states that within the research that has been completed thus far, the results are conflicting.

“Three large epidemiology studies have been published since December 2000. Between them, the studies investigated any possible association between the use of wireless phones and primary brain cancer, glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma, tumors of the brain or salivary gland, leukemia, or other cancers. None of the studies demonstrated the existence of any harmful health effects from wireless phone RF exposures. However, none of the studies can answer questions about long-term exposures, since the average period of phone use in these studies was around three years.”According to the Oxford Journal, a study was conducted between the years 2000 and 2002, where “the authors examined the possible association between use of cellular telephones and development of acoustic neuroma”. Their results, published in 2004, were as follows:

“Use of a cell phone for 10 years or more did not increase acoustic neuroma risk over that of short-term users. Furthermore, tumors did not occur more frequently on the side of the head on which the telephone was typically used, and the size of the tumor did not correlate with the pattern of cell phone use. The results of this prospective, population-based, nationwide study, which included a large number of long-term users of cellular telephones, do not support an association between cell phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma.” 

My two-cents in regards to cell phone use and safety, I believe, is the overall truth. We the people, the scientists and the government really don’t know what effect EMF radiation has on the body and the earth. In short term studies, it is clear that there is no absolute correlation but long-term studies are difficult to complete as they obviously take a long time. There are also varying degrees of cell phone use between people. I use mine a few days per week…some people walk through the grocery store with a cell phone plugged into their ear.  

As in all aspects of life, everything should be enjoyed in moderation. I would not spend hours on a cell phone, or any phone for that matter. There are more important things to do in life than talk on the phone. Would I buy a cell phone for my 6 year old?? No. A very definitive “no”, but not necessarily because of the potential dangers; I wouldn’t buy him a cell phone for the same reason that I wouldn’t buy him a digital camera or an MP3…he’s six years old!  Here are some helpful links:  

 

v     http://www.who.int/peh-emf/en/

v     http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/159/3/277

v     http://www.fda.gov/cellphones/qa.html#31

v     http://www.safewireless.org

v     http://cellphonesafety.wordpress.com/

Has your cell phone got you down? Maybe you need to get back to basics with our 7 Ways to Embrace the Miracle of Life.  

 

 

Technorati , , , , , , ,

September 22, 2006

The Cost of Going Organic

As the popularity of buying organic produce continues to grow worldwide, the questions regarding the cost are growing at a steady pace as well. Recently, ModernSage.com received a question in regards to the cost of buying organic produce. The question reads:

“Hi there! I just have a quick question. I would like to know if you can possibly help answer it. Why is it that organic food is more expensive? Doesn’t it take less work because it is organic? I don’t understand why it seems to be backwards? We pay less for food that costs more to maintain with the use of pesticides and more for the food that we don’t need to use pesticides? I’d appreciate if you can get back to me either way. Thank you. By the way, I love your site.”


This is not the first time that I have heard this question, but in all honesty, I did not know the answer. So, in my attempt to answer the question and educate myself at the same time, I’ve done some research on this topic that may be of interest to readers. It is actually fairly simple to understand why the cost of organic foods is higher than conventional produce.
 
The first reason I’ve discovered that seems the simplest is that producing organic food requires labor-intensive techniques. Farmers and producers work in environmentally friendly ways, which require, for instance, substituting pesticide use for more hand weeding. In addition, organic farm owners are at a higher risk of losing crops because they don’t use the more conventional methods of dealing with pest outbreaks and diseases.
 
Organic farms also yield a smaller crop, as they don’t use conventional growing methods. Conventional farmers often utilize cheap to buy and transport chemical fertilizers and sewage sludge to grow their crop. Organic farmers, however, use all-natural animal manure, which is quite heavier and much more expensive to ship. Organic farmers also use organic feed for their cattle and other livestock, which can cost double the amount of conventional feed. In addition, simply certifying the food as organic involves additional administrative costs.
 
Conventional farms yield far more crop because they use every acre to grow their foods. In contrast, organic farmers practice crop rotation practices to keep their soil healthy. They do not plant money-yielding crops on every acre every year because they rotate fields and plat crops to be plowed. This method yields fewer cash crops but improves the soil’s nutrients for the long term. Conventional farms yield high volumes that can be sold at low prices.
 
Because organic farms yield fewer crops, and there are less organic farms than conventional, the demand for organic food is greater than the available supply. The simple law of supply and demand explains this reason for the rise in cost. In addition, many retailers simply charge more for organic produce.
 
Seems pretty simple to understand now, doesn’t it? And that is not even taking into account the argument that conventional crops have invisible costs, such as cancers and other diseases in farm workers and their children and the contamination of water supplies…but that is another issue altogether.
 
We want to know what you think…is buying organic worth the cost? Visit our message boards and tell us what you think:
http://www.modernsageonline.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php
 
 
 

Technorati , , , , ,

September 14, 2006

Blue Jeans Go Green?

I know that “green” is a hot topic everywhere these days as the popularity of all things organic grows well beyond the farm. However, I never imagined that blue jeans, worn everyday by millions of people, would end up on the eco-friendly bandwagon. Of course, I never knew that the process of making blue jeans was actually dangerous for the environment.

Admittedly, I am not a green expert. When the checkbook permits, I will opt for organic. But most of my fruits and veggies come from our homegrown, pesticide-free garden. When it comes to clothing, like most, I’ve seen my share of items made with hemp. However, I’ve always thought the reasoning had something to do with the feeling you get when you inhale the scent or something. Apparently, I’ve some learning to do.

In my research, I’ve discovered that the process involved in the production of denim causes significant damage to water and soil. According to Panna.org, cotton growers use many of the most hazardous pesticides on the market. In addition, the indigo color necessary for the “blue” in blue jeans, is traditionally created using aniline, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide, all of which come from drilled oil.

Thankfully, for those eco-aware jean lovers with very large pocket books, you now have a choice! Several clothing companies, such as Del Forte Denim, have adopted new eco-friendly production methods, such as using organic cotton and rinsing the jeans in a chemical-free wash. The eco-wise denim is reportedly non-toxic and earth-friendly.

So, how much will you be out if you opt for the green fashion? Close to $200 for some brands. A great option for the eco-considerate upscale shopper. But there is hope for the rest of us; Levi Jeans is introducing their new line of 100% organic cotton jeans in the Fall of 2006 (ie. now!). I, for one, am patiently awaiting their arrival…and crossing my fingers that they won’t be over my jean budget of $40 per pair.

Have you seen them yet?? Let us know! And by the way, if you’re looking for all things “green”, be sure to check out our Natural Store at ModernSage.com.  

Technorati , , , , , , ,

September 6, 2006

How can we feed our children more healthfully in school?

Filed under: General — Last @ 3:19 pm

It was not yet 11 a.m. at the Partin Settlement Elementary School in Kissimmee, Fla., on a sunny day last October. But lunch service necessarily begins early when there are 838 children to feed, and the meal was already well under way. Danielle Hollar walked calmly amid the lunchroom chaos, holding a large, raw, uncut sweet potato in one hand and a tray filled with tiny cups of purйed sweet potatoes in the other. That Hollar does not get frazzled even among hundreds of jabbering children is one of the talents she brings to her job. That she is tall and blond and slim, and many of the students seem to have school-kid crushes on her, is another.

31.jpg 22.jpg

How can we feed our children more healthfully in school?
Photomontage by Stephen Lewis
“This is a sweet potato,” she said, as she stopped at each table and gave each child a purйe sample. “It has a lot of vitamin A and C and B6. Have you ever seen one of these?” Most of the children had not. “It’s like a regular potato, but it’s orange inside,” she said, which got their attention. “It has a lot more vitamins than a white potato.”

Angelina wanted to know why there were no marshmallows on top. Angel put down his lemon pie, tried the sweet potatoes and announced he preferred the pie. Mateo, however, was making a meal of what his classmates eyed so suspiciously. Collecting the cups of everyone around him, he ate a dozen of the tablespoon-size portions before a teacher cut him off.

“It’s sweet, which is why it’s called a sweet potato, but it’s also good for you,” Hollar said, as she moved from table to table, sounding one exclamation point short of a sales pitch. Eager as she was to get the children to taste what she offered, though, she pointedly refused to compare this vegetable to candy.

“I don’t like sweet potatoes,” said Jessica, who is in the second grade.

“Have you ever tried one?” Hollar asked.

Posted by FinanceGod

Don’t Give Up! The easy way to lose weight.

Filed under: General — Last @ 2:46 pm

Slim BodyHave you tried all possible diets to lose weight only to find yourself at the same weight or even worse? Losing weight can be difficult at times because of misconceptions about food and how the metabolism really works. Many foods that we think are low in calorie are really not. We eat what we think is right, unaware of the hidden fat and calories. Losing weight can seem impossible if you’re not aware of hidden fat.

You should never skip meals to lose weight. Eat 500 to 700 calories under your basic metabolic rate to properly lose weight. Unfortunately, many sabotage their metabolism by not eating. Too many people think the only way to lose weight is to skip meals starting with breakfast. This practice is guaranteed to bring your metabolism to a screeching halt! The best ways to increase your metabolism does not come from pills but by eating smaller meals through the day and regular exercise.

Millions waste their money on diet pills, herbs and diet contraptions. The US Food and Drug Administration clearly states that you should make a modest reduction in calories and exercise more to lose weight. They also warn against using dietary supplements that claim to trap fat, block fat absorption, flush fat out of the body, raise metabolism or decrease your appetite. Many of these supplements are dangerous to your health and they don’t work as advertised!

The good news is that you can lose weight by eating great tasting foods through the day. The biggest misconception is that you have to skip meals and eat “rabbit food” to lose weight. Many people are surprised that you can make great tasting homemade hamburgers made with lean beef, low fat cheese, toppings and whole wheat bread for the same amount of calories and less fat than a bowl of clam chowder. The trick is to modify what you normally eat.

Read the labels on foods that you buy in the grocery store. This is going to help you evaluate the amount of calories and fat and give you better insight to planning meals. Don’t believe the hype, CALORIES DO MATTER!

A tuna or turkey sandwich from the deli shop can have as many as 900 calories and 25 grams of fat because of the mayonnaise or cheese. However, there are great low fat alternatives if you like mayonnaise and cheese. You can quickly make a turkey sandwich with light mayonnaise and low fat cheese that’s only 300 calories with 6 grams of fat.

You do not have to give up all your favorite foods to lose weight but you need a good diet plan. Avoid long period between meals without eating. This will slow down your metabolism. Manage your portion size and know the approximate amount of calories you will be eating.

When your body loses fat it produces water which may increase your weight during the first week or two of a new diet. Have you ever been discourage because you did all the right things only to get on the scale and discover that you didn’t lose a pound? That probably was due to the extra fluid which is a by-product of losing fat.

Posted by Miss Fashion

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress